Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 75-84.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5058
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hai-bing HE1,2, Ru YANG2, Li-quan WU1, Fu-yu MA2,*()
Received:
2015-04-02
Revised:
2015-07-02
Online:
2016-01-10
Published:
2016-01-10
Contact:
Fu-yu MA
通讯作者:
马富裕
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Hai-bing HE, Ru YANG, Li-quan WU, Fu-yu MA. Optimal Capillary Configuration Modes and Irrigation Intensities for Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 75-84.
何海兵, 杨茹, 武立权, 马富裕. 膜下滴灌水稻优化毛管配置模式及适宜灌溉强度的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 75-84.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5058
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 模型参数 Logistic parameter | R2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | k | ||||
宁粳28 Ninjing 28 | R1W1 | 13959.62 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | |
R1W2 | 18552.18 | 1750.93 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R1W3 | 23059.99 | 439.07 | 0.07 | 0.994 | ||
R1W4 | 26257.15 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R2W1 | 12690.57 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | ||
R2W2 | 16865.62 | 1750.73 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R2W3 | 20963.23 | 439.06 | 0.07 | 0.995 | ||
R2W4 | 24870.13 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W1 | 7183.76 | 450.71 | 0.08 | 0.989 | ||
R3W2 | 10071.74 | 979.18 | 0.08 | 0.988 | ||
R3W3 | 13414.73 | 296.69 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W4 | 17313.09 | 257.91 | 0.07 | 0.996 | ||
月光Yueguang | R1W1 | 15355.59 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | |
R1W2 | 20407.41 | 1750.93 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R1W3 | 25365.51 | 439.07 | 0.07 | 0.994 | ||
R1W4 | 28882.86 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R2W1 | 12275.23 | 1602.29 | 0.10 | 0.994 | ||
R2W2 | 17252.87 | 339.77 | 0.07 | 0.997 | ||
R2W3 | 24052.43 | 212.06 | 0.06 | 0.993 | ||
R2W4 | 27433.39 | 250.51 | 0.06 | 0.995 | ||
R3W1 | 6932.29 | 419.22 | 0.08 | 0.978 | ||
R3W2 | 10446.03 | 191.79 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W3 | 15671.68 | 148.88 | 0.05 | 0.992 | ||
R3W4 | 18198.03 | 230.44 | 0.06 | 0.985 |
Table 1 Logistic parameters of dry matter weight of aboveground part in rice under different drip-tape configuration modes and irrigation quotas.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 模型参数 Logistic parameter | R2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | k | ||||
宁粳28 Ninjing 28 | R1W1 | 13959.62 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | |
R1W2 | 18552.18 | 1750.93 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R1W3 | 23059.99 | 439.07 | 0.07 | 0.994 | ||
R1W4 | 26257.15 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R2W1 | 12690.57 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | ||
R2W2 | 16865.62 | 1750.73 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R2W3 | 20963.23 | 439.06 | 0.07 | 0.995 | ||
R2W4 | 24870.13 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W1 | 7183.76 | 450.71 | 0.08 | 0.989 | ||
R3W2 | 10071.74 | 979.18 | 0.08 | 0.988 | ||
R3W3 | 13414.73 | 296.69 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W4 | 17313.09 | 257.91 | 0.07 | 0.996 | ||
月光Yueguang | R1W1 | 15355.59 | 1260.31 | 0.09 | 0.997 | |
R1W2 | 20407.41 | 1750.93 | 0.08 | 0.993 | ||
R1W3 | 25365.51 | 439.07 | 0.07 | 0.994 | ||
R1W4 | 28882.86 | 304.18 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R2W1 | 12275.23 | 1602.29 | 0.10 | 0.994 | ||
R2W2 | 17252.87 | 339.77 | 0.07 | 0.997 | ||
R2W3 | 24052.43 | 212.06 | 0.06 | 0.993 | ||
R2W4 | 27433.39 | 250.51 | 0.06 | 0.995 | ||
R3W1 | 6932.29 | 419.22 | 0.08 | 0.978 | ||
R3W2 | 10446.03 | 191.79 | 0.06 | 0.994 | ||
R3W3 | 15671.68 | 148.88 | 0.05 | 0.992 | ||
R3W4 | 18198.03 | 230.44 | 0.06 | 0.985 |
Fig. 2. Dry matter weight accumulated in aboveground part in rice under different drip-tape configuration modes and irrigation intensities. R1,One sheet of plastic film mulching with four drip tapes and eight rows of rice; R2,One sheet of plastic film mulching with two drip tapes and eight rows of rice; R3,One sheet of plastic film mulching with one drip tapes and eight rows of rice; W1,Water irrigation amount of 0.55×104 m3/hm2;W2,0.85×104 m3/hm2;W3,1.20×104 m3/hm2;W4,1.50×104m3/hm2.n=3. The same as below.
品种与处理 Variety and treatment | 每1m2穗数 Panicle number per square metre | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting percentage /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(×103kg· hm-2) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency | 经济效益 Economic benefit /(Yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁粳28 Ningjing 28 | |||||||
R1W4 | 440.56 | 105.67 | 47.14 | 22.01 | 5.89 | 0.39 | 5604 |
R1W3 | 453.24 | 108.99 | 45.3 | 21.39 | 5.27 | 0.44 | 4872 |
R1W2 | 386.58 | 98.42 | 37.74 | 21.17 | 4.13 | 0.49 | 2518 |
R1W1 | 328.78 | 89.77 | 31.35 | 20.22 | 3.54 | 0.64 | 1894 |
R2W4 | 423.24 | 101.98 | 46.13 | 22.03 | 5.97 | 0.40 | 7872 |
R2W3 | 435.76 | 108.52 | 42.83 | 21.36 | 5.11 | 0.41 | 6276 |
R2W2 | 354.14 | 94.52 | 37.63 | 21.05 | 3.98 | 0.49 | 3958 |
R2W1 | 311.58 | 86.43 | 30.83 | 19.84 | 3.35 | 0.61 | 3190 |
R3W4 | 357.52 | 88.07 | 41.33 | 21.98 | 3.27 | 0.22 | -858 |
R3W3 | 359.58 | 87.53 | 38.27 | 21.01 | 2.89 | 0.25 | -744 |
R3W2 | 264.32 | 75.68 | 27.35 | 19.37 | 2.17 | 0.26 | -1568 |
R3W1 | 229.64 | 67.89 | 23.67 | 18.09 | 1.88 | 0.34 | -1112 |
毛管配置(R) | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
灌溉强度(W) | ** | * | ** | * | ** | ** | |
R×W | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
月光Yueguang | |||||||
R1W4 | 444.46 | 109.42 | 74.38 | 22.87 | 6.23 | 0.42 | 6828 |
R1W3 | 459.87 | 112.35 | 70.88 | 22.43 | 5.44 | 0.45 | 5484 |
R1W2 | 383.45 | 100.78 | 63.88 | 21.96 | 4.37 | 0.51 | 3382 |
R1W1 | 335.31 | 95.35 | 57.94 | 21.45 | 3.79 | 0.69 | 2794 |
R2W4 | 456.47 | 105.34 | 70.43 | 22.52 | 6.17 | 0.41 | 8592 |
R2W3 | 451.42 | 113.52 | 65.78 | 22.03 | 5.32 | 0.44 | 7032 |
R2W2 | 368.79 | 97.56 | 63.24 | 21.67 | 4.29 | 0.51 | 5074 |
R2W1 | 342.15 | 89.88 | 59.77 | 20.51 | 3.49 | 0.64 | 3694 |
R3W4 | 362.24 | 75.33 | 58.34 | 21.36 | 2.64 | 0.18 | -3126 |
R3W3 | 361.43 | 72.18 | 55.16 | 21.27 | 2.26 | 0.19 | -2994 |
R3W2 | 273.15 | 61.88 | 41.59 | 20.55 | 1.69 | 0.21 | -3296 |
R3W1 | 252.29 | 53.35 | 40.38 | 19.64 | 1.48 | 0.27 | -2552 |
毛管配置(R) | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
灌溉强度(W) | ** | * | ** | * | ** | ** | |
R×W | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** |
Table 2 Grain yield, yield components, water use efficiency and economic benefit of rice under different drip-tape configuration modes and irrigation quotas.
品种与处理 Variety and treatment | 每1m2穗数 Panicle number per square metre | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting percentage /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(×103kg· hm-2) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency | 经济效益 Economic benefit /(Yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁粳28 Ningjing 28 | |||||||
R1W4 | 440.56 | 105.67 | 47.14 | 22.01 | 5.89 | 0.39 | 5604 |
R1W3 | 453.24 | 108.99 | 45.3 | 21.39 | 5.27 | 0.44 | 4872 |
R1W2 | 386.58 | 98.42 | 37.74 | 21.17 | 4.13 | 0.49 | 2518 |
R1W1 | 328.78 | 89.77 | 31.35 | 20.22 | 3.54 | 0.64 | 1894 |
R2W4 | 423.24 | 101.98 | 46.13 | 22.03 | 5.97 | 0.40 | 7872 |
R2W3 | 435.76 | 108.52 | 42.83 | 21.36 | 5.11 | 0.41 | 6276 |
R2W2 | 354.14 | 94.52 | 37.63 | 21.05 | 3.98 | 0.49 | 3958 |
R2W1 | 311.58 | 86.43 | 30.83 | 19.84 | 3.35 | 0.61 | 3190 |
R3W4 | 357.52 | 88.07 | 41.33 | 21.98 | 3.27 | 0.22 | -858 |
R3W3 | 359.58 | 87.53 | 38.27 | 21.01 | 2.89 | 0.25 | -744 |
R3W2 | 264.32 | 75.68 | 27.35 | 19.37 | 2.17 | 0.26 | -1568 |
R3W1 | 229.64 | 67.89 | 23.67 | 18.09 | 1.88 | 0.34 | -1112 |
毛管配置(R) | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
灌溉强度(W) | ** | * | ** | * | ** | ** | |
R×W | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
月光Yueguang | |||||||
R1W4 | 444.46 | 109.42 | 74.38 | 22.87 | 6.23 | 0.42 | 6828 |
R1W3 | 459.87 | 112.35 | 70.88 | 22.43 | 5.44 | 0.45 | 5484 |
R1W2 | 383.45 | 100.78 | 63.88 | 21.96 | 4.37 | 0.51 | 3382 |
R1W1 | 335.31 | 95.35 | 57.94 | 21.45 | 3.79 | 0.69 | 2794 |
R2W4 | 456.47 | 105.34 | 70.43 | 22.52 | 6.17 | 0.41 | 8592 |
R2W3 | 451.42 | 113.52 | 65.78 | 22.03 | 5.32 | 0.44 | 7032 |
R2W2 | 368.79 | 97.56 | 63.24 | 21.67 | 4.29 | 0.51 | 5074 |
R2W1 | 342.15 | 89.88 | 59.77 | 20.51 | 3.49 | 0.64 | 3694 |
R3W4 | 362.24 | 75.33 | 58.34 | 21.36 | 2.64 | 0.18 | -3126 |
R3W3 | 361.43 | 72.18 | 55.16 | 21.27 | 2.26 | 0.19 | -2994 |
R3W2 | 273.15 | 61.88 | 41.59 | 20.55 | 1.69 | 0.21 | -3296 |
R3W1 | 252.29 | 53.35 | 40.38 | 19.64 | 1.48 | 0.27 | -2552 |
毛管配置(R) | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
灌溉强度(W) | ** | * | ** | * | ** | ** | |
R×W | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** |
品种、处理和行位 Variety,treatment and row | 株高 Plant height /cm | 每1m2穗数 Panicle number per square metre | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting percentage /% | 一次枝梗数 Primary rachis branch number /(No. m-2) | 二次枝梗数 Secondary rachis branch number /(No. m-2) | 无效穗长 Length of invalid panicle /cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁粳28 Ningjing 28 | |||||||
R1 | 82.11 | 405.26 | 91.23 | 40.15 | 10.58 | 14.65 | 1.05 |
R2 | |||||||
第一行First row | 82.83 | 411.24 | 95.07 | 40.90 | 10.67 | 14.67 | 1.16 |
第二行Second row | 80.07 | 371.10 | 86.93 | 38.60 | 10.23 | 13.33 | 1.31 |
差值Differece/% | 3.6 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 11.5 |
R3 | |||||||
第一行First row | 82.53 | 417.15 | 99.14 | 38.37 | 11.13 | 13.89 | 0.89 |
第二行Second row | 81.47 | 422.12 | 107.67 | 40.15 | 12.25 | 14.35 | 0.56 |
第三行Third row | 50.13 | 168.67 | 59.41 | 2.13 | 6.60 | 5.14 | 4.34 |
第四行Fourth row | 32.15 | 92.33 | 34.14 | 1.32 | 2.30 | 3.22 | 8.79 |
差值Differece/% | 0.8~60.5 | 1.0~78.6 | 7.9~68.3 | 4.4~96.7 | 9.1~81.2 | 3.2~77.6 | 50.6~93.6 |
月光 Yueguang | |||||||
R1 | 73.51 | 412.13 | 104.55 | 66.51 | 8.12 | 10.35 | 0.28 |
R2 | |||||||
第一行First row | 75.74 | 421.62 | 109.34 | 69.33 | 7.92 | 9.98 | 0.31 |
第二行Second row | 71.93 | 381.63 | 99.02 | 63.37 | 7.34 | 9.24 | 0.42 |
差值Differece/% | 3.9 | 9.5 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 26.2 |
R3 | |||||||
第一行First row | 73.26 | 424.56 | 106.68 | 67.33 | 7.53 | 10.01 | 0.25 |
第二行Second row | 74.31 | 436.69 | 108.47 | 65.41 | 8.21 | 10.68 | 0.19 |
第三行Third row | 41.14 | 229.87 | 41.59 | 35.21 | 3.25 | 4.11 | 3.88 |
第四行Fourth row | 30.57 | 134.89 | 23.74 | 23.55 | 1.67 | 2.05 | 9.17 |
差值Differece/% | 4.1~58.9 | 6.6~68.8 | 8.1~78.1 | 3.2~64.0 | 8.3~79.7 | 6.3~80.8 | 57.7~97.9 |
Table 3 Agronomic traits of rice at different rows under various drip-tape configuration modes.
品种、处理和行位 Variety,treatment and row | 株高 Plant height /cm | 每1m2穗数 Panicle number per square metre | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting percentage /% | 一次枝梗数 Primary rachis branch number /(No. m-2) | 二次枝梗数 Secondary rachis branch number /(No. m-2) | 无效穗长 Length of invalid panicle /cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁粳28 Ningjing 28 | |||||||
R1 | 82.11 | 405.26 | 91.23 | 40.15 | 10.58 | 14.65 | 1.05 |
R2 | |||||||
第一行First row | 82.83 | 411.24 | 95.07 | 40.90 | 10.67 | 14.67 | 1.16 |
第二行Second row | 80.07 | 371.10 | 86.93 | 38.60 | 10.23 | 13.33 | 1.31 |
差值Differece/% | 3.6 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 11.5 |
R3 | |||||||
第一行First row | 82.53 | 417.15 | 99.14 | 38.37 | 11.13 | 13.89 | 0.89 |
第二行Second row | 81.47 | 422.12 | 107.67 | 40.15 | 12.25 | 14.35 | 0.56 |
第三行Third row | 50.13 | 168.67 | 59.41 | 2.13 | 6.60 | 5.14 | 4.34 |
第四行Fourth row | 32.15 | 92.33 | 34.14 | 1.32 | 2.30 | 3.22 | 8.79 |
差值Differece/% | 0.8~60.5 | 1.0~78.6 | 7.9~68.3 | 4.4~96.7 | 9.1~81.2 | 3.2~77.6 | 50.6~93.6 |
月光 Yueguang | |||||||
R1 | 73.51 | 412.13 | 104.55 | 66.51 | 8.12 | 10.35 | 0.28 |
R2 | |||||||
第一行First row | 75.74 | 421.62 | 109.34 | 69.33 | 7.92 | 9.98 | 0.31 |
第二行Second row | 71.93 | 381.63 | 99.02 | 63.37 | 7.34 | 9.24 | 0.42 |
差值Differece/% | 3.9 | 9.5 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 26.2 |
R3 | |||||||
第一行First row | 73.26 | 424.56 | 106.68 | 67.33 | 7.53 | 10.01 | 0.25 |
第二行Second row | 74.31 | 436.69 | 108.47 | 65.41 | 8.21 | 10.68 | 0.19 |
第三行Third row | 41.14 | 229.87 | 41.59 | 35.21 | 3.25 | 4.11 | 3.88 |
第四行Fourth row | 30.57 | 134.89 | 23.74 | 23.55 | 1.67 | 2.05 | 9.17 |
差值Differece/% | 4.1~58.9 | 6.6~68.8 | 8.1~78.1 | 3.2~64.0 | 8.3~79.7 | 6.3~80.8 | 57.7~97.9 |
[1] | Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, et al.Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling.Plant Physiol, 2001, 127(1): 315-323. |
[2] | Bouman B A M, Tuong T P. Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice.Agric Water Manag, 2001, 49(1): 11-30. |
[3] | Bouman B A M, Peng S B, Castaneda A R, et al. Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems.Agric Water Manag, 2005, 74(2): 87-105. |
[4] | Bouman B A M, Yang X G, Wang H Q, et al. Aerobic rice (Han Dao): A new way of growing rice in water-short areas// Proceedings of the 12th international soil conservation organization conference, China: Beijing, 2002. |
[5] | Tao H B, Brueck H, Dittert K, et al.Growth and yield formation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the water-saving ground cover rice production system (GCRPS).Field Crops Res, 2006, 95(1): 1-12. |
[6] | Zhang L M, Lin S, Bouman B A M, et al. Response of aerobic rice growth and grain yield to N fertilizer at two contrasting sites near Beijing, China.Field Crops Res, 2009, 114: 45-53. |
[7] | Peng S B, Bouman B A M, Visperas R M, et al. Comparison between aerobic and flooded rice in the tropics: Agronomic performance in an eight-season experiment.Field Crops Res, 2006, 96(2): 252-259. |
[8] | 陈林, 郭庆人. 膜下滴灌水稻栽培技术的形成与发展. 作物研究,2012,26(5):587-588. |
Chen L, Guo Q R.The formation and development of rice cultivation technology in plastic mulch with drip irrigation.Crop Res, 2012, 26(5): 587-588. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 郭庆人, 陈林. 水稻膜下滴灌栽培技术在我国发展的优势及前景分析. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(4): 36-39. |
Guo Q R, Chen L.The advantages and prospects of development of rice planted under plastic mulch with drip irrigation in China.China Rice, 2012, 18(4): 36-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Peacock W L, Rolston D E, Aljibury F K, et al.Evaluating drip, flood, and sprinkler irrigation of wine grapes.Amer J Enol Viticul, 1977, 28(4): 193-195. |
[11] | Hodgson A S, Constable G A, Duddy G R, et al.A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil.Irrig Sci, 1990, 11(3), 143-148. |
[12] | Aujla M S, Thind H S, Buttar G S.Cotton yield and water use efficiency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting.Agric Water Manag, 2005, 71(2): 167-179. |
[13] | Daĝdelen N, Başal H, Yılmaz E, et al.Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey.Agric Water Manag, 2009, 96(1): 111-120. |
[14] | Wanjura D F, Upchurch D R, Mahan J R, et al.Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation.Agric Water Manag, 2002, 55(3): 217-237. |
[15] | Hanson B, May D.Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity, and profitability.Agric Water Manag, 2004, 68(1): 1-17. |
[16] | Vázquez N, Pardo A, Suso M L, et al.Drainage and nitrate leaching under processing tomato growth with drip irrigation and plastic mulching.Agric Ecosy Environ, 2006, 112(4): 313-323. |
[17] | 胡安焱, 董新光, 魏光辉,等.滴灌条件下水肥耦合对干旱区红枣产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2010, 29(6): 60-63. |
Hu A Y, Dong X G, Wei G H, et al.Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield of Chinese jujube under drip irrigation in the arid area.J Irrig Drain, 2010, 29(6): 60-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 姚宝林, 孙三民, 孙建,等.节水控盐滴灌对土壤盐分、红枣光合及产量的影响.干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(4): 148-152. |
Yao B L, Sun S M, Sun J, et al.Influence of water-saving and salt-controlling drip irrigation on soil salt content, photosynthesis rate and red jujube yield.Agric Res Arid Areas, 2011, 29(4): 148-152 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[19] | Phene C J, Davis K R, Hutmacher R B, et al.Effect of high frequency surface and subsurface drip irrigation on root distribution of sweet corn.Irrig Sci, 1991, 12(3): 135-140. |
[20] | Oktem A, Simsek M, Oktem A G.Deficit irrigation effects on sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) with drip irrigation system in a semi-arid region: I. Water-yield relationship.Agric Water Manag, 2003, 61(1): 63-74. |
[21] | Liao L J, Zhang L, Bengtsson L.Soil moisture variation and water consumption of spring wheat and their effects on crop yield under drip irrigation.Irrig Drain Sys, 2008, 22(3/4), 253-270. |
[22] | 杨茹, 何海兵, 廖江,等.滴灌春小麦的籽粒灌浆特性. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(4): 743-746. |
Yang Y, He H B, Liao J, et al.Study on grain-filling properties of spring wheat under drip irrigation.J Triti Crops, 2012, 32(4): 743-746. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 程裕伟, 冯治磊, 王谊,等. 滴灌条件下春小麦耗水规律研究.干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(2): 112-117. |
Chen Y W, Feng Z L, Wang Y, et al.Study on water consumption rules in spring wheat under drip irrigation.Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012, 30(2): 112-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 何庆祥, 张想平, 钱永康,等.甘肃河西灌区啤酒大麦滴灌栽培技术.大麦与谷类科学, 2010, (3): 26-27. |
He Q X, Zhang X P, Qian Y K, et al.Cultivation techniques of malting barley under drip irrigation in Hexi corridor oasis irrigation area of Gansu Province.Barl Cereal Sci, 2010, 3: 26-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Isla R, Royo A, Aragüés R.Field screening of barley cultivars to soil salinity using a sprinkler and a drip irrigation system.Plant Soil, 1997, 197(1): 105-117. |
[26] | Li Y, Wallach R, Cohen Y.The role of soil hydraulic conductivity on the spatial and temporal variation of root water uptake in drip-irrigated corn.Plant Soil, 2002, 243(2): 131-142. |
[27] | Du T S, Kang S Z, Zhang J H.Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China.Irrig Sci, 2008, 26: 147-159. |
[28] | Patel N, Rajput T B S. Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion.Agric Water Manag, 2008, 95(12): 1335-1349. |
[29] | 蔡焕杰, 邵光成, 张振华. 棉花膜下滴灌毛管布置方式的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2002, 18(1): 45-49. |
Cai H J, Shao G C, Zhang Z H.The study of capillary configuration modes of cotton in drip irrigation with plastic mulching.Trans CSAE, 2002, 18(1): 45-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 廖江. 毛管配置模式与灌溉定额对滴灌春小麦土壤水分分布及产量的影响. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2012. |
Liao J.Effects of different lateral placements and irrigation quotas on soil moisture distribution and grain yield of drip irrigated spring wheat. Shihezi: Shihezi university, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 杨茹. 水分调控下滴灌春小麦穗发育特性及其空间分异性研究. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2012. |
Yang Y.Study on the characteristics of spikelet differentiation and the differentiation in the space of spring wheat of drip irrigation under water regulation. Shihezi: Shihezi university, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | He H B, Yang R, Ma F Y.Rice root system spatial distribution characteristics at flowering stage and grain yield under plastic mulching drip irrigation (PMDI).J Anim Plant Sci, 2014, 24(1): 290-301. |
[33] | O’Toole J C, Garrity D P. Upland rice soil-plant-water relation-ships. An overview of upland rice research. Los Baños, the Philippines:IRRI, 1984: 394-411. |
[34] | Ekanayake I J, de Datta S K, Steponkus P L. Spikelet sterility and flowering response of rice to water stress at anthesis.Ann Bot, 1989, 63(2): 257-264. |
[35] | Bresler E.Trickle-drip irrigation: Principles and application to soil-Water Management.Adv Agron, 1977, 29(3): 343-393. |
[36] | Ben-Asher J, Yano T, Shainberg I.Dripper discharge rates and the hydraulic properties of the soil.Irrig Drain Sys, 2003, 17(4): 325-340. |
[37] | Badr M A, Taalab A S.Effect of drip irrigation and discharge rate on water and solute dynamics in sandy soil and tomato yield.Austr J Bas Appl Sci, 2007, 1(4): 545-552. |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||